Sunday, 3 November 2013

The Amazing Race 23, Episode 5 (FAQ: Buying a Touring Bicycle)

Gdansk (Poland) - Vienna (Austria)

Viewers of the most recent episode of The Amazing Race 23 may have been surprised that it took the racers 22 hours to cross Poland (and the smaller Czech Republic) from Gdansk to Vienna. That's partly because of the limited frequency of long-distance international trains (most of which are deliberately scheduled to operate overnight) and the consequent long layover between trains in Warsaw, and partly because trains in Poland, like most of those in central and Eastern Europe, are still generally slower than those in Western Europe. But it also takes more time to cross Poland than you might think because Poland is bigger than many people think.

Yet while Poland today (after, of course, multiple historical revisions of its borders and even its definition as a country) is only slightly smaller than Germany (ditto) in area, Poland's population (38 million, twice that of the next largest EU member state) is slightly less than half that of Germany. In other words, Poland is only about half as densely populated as Germany, or of the UK or Italy.

As in Spain and France, much of the population of Poland lives in the big cities but much of the land is rural. The land is generally a level plain except along the southern and southwestern borders, with numerous rivers, ten thousand lakes, and some of the largest forest preserves in Europe. Think of a European counterpart of the farms, lakes, streams, woods, and small towns of Minnesota. Average temperatures across Poland are even similar to those in Minnesota, although typically with less extreme highs or lows and less daily or annual fluctuation.

Most visitors from the USA to Poland are visiting friends and relatives and/or exploring family history. Other than among Polish-Americans, however, Poland has a lower profile in the USA as a tourist destination than any other similarly large or populous European country. Most US tourists (except those with family reasons to visit a specific village or small town) focus on the cities.

It's the lakes, forests, rivers, and countryside, however, that are the destination of most domestic Polish vacationers and a growing share of tourists from elsewhere in Europe. Poland markets itself as a preferred European destination for outdoor activities: camping, canoeing, hunting, fishing, and, yes, bicycling.

The terrain is largely flat, and there are dense networks of campgrounds, hostels, and home-stay accommodations. I haven't been to Poland (yet), but it sounds like an attractive place for rural meandering by bicycle, without the need to reserve or plan your route too much in advance. Potential drawbacks include a high language barrier (German and/or Russian might be more useful than English) and the sometimes poor condition of any roads or paths except those with heavy truck traffic, as highlighted in this page of advice for foreign cyclists from a local Polish advocacy group for bicyclists.

Supposing the idea of travelling around Poland by bicycle, or a trip by bicycle someplace else like the ones Phil Keoghan of "The Amazing Race" and I both took this past summer, catches your fancy, and you haven't done anything like that before, how do you get started on bicycle touring? Get a bike and go, obviously. But what sort of bike, and how do you find it? That's the question I'll try to answer below.

Crossing North America by bike, I met too many people who said they fantasize about long-distance travel by bicycle, but assume that their dream is impossible. As with the dream of a trip around the world, I want to help people realize their travel fantasies. This will be a longer article than most of my columns about The Amazing Race, but given Phil Keoghan's and my shared interest not just in cycling but in travel by bicycle, I hope fans of the race and my other readers will forgive my taking some time to explain just how you, too, could travel by bike. This is a topic I haven't seen treated well elsewhere, and that isn't covered in previous editions of The Practical Nomad: How to Travel Around the World, which focus more on bicycles for local sightseeing -- for which you can make use of pretty much any kind of bicycle that's locally available -- rather than long-distance travel by bicycle.

Touring bike buying guide FAQ:
How to buy a touring bicycle

What sort of a bicycle do you need for touring, and how do you go about procuring it?

First, get a bike (get the bike you already have out of storage, borrow a bike, or get an inexpensive second-hand bike) and start riding as much as you comfortably can. Not so much to get into better shape -- as I mentioned in one of my columns earlier in this season, you can start a tour slowly, and work yourself into better shape as you go, as long as you aren't in a hurry and haven't committed yourself to a schedule or pace -- but in order to find out what bike will fit you best, and how you want it configured.

Start early. Don't wait until spring to start shopping for a bike for a summer tour. Your riding style, the type of bike you want, and its proportions and details are likely to change significantly as you ride more and get into better shape. A bike that you find comfortable at first, if you haven't been riding much recently, may be very different from the bike you pick out after six months of riding regularly for a few hours a week. What feels good for an hour's ride may not feel so good for an all-day ride.

There's a whole universe of bicycles for different people and purposes, with no single dimension along which they can be ordered, either literally or figuratively. Some aspects of a bicycle's fit can be adjusted after you buy it, but many others are set in steel when the frame is built. The best starting point for fitting a new bike is a bike you already have, and have adjusted and adapted as well as possible so that you know (or a bike fit expert can tell) what fits, what doesn't, and what needs to be different, and how, for your new bike to fit you better than the one you are using as a prototype.

If you are lucky, have proportions that are a close fit to some manufacturer's template, and find a knowledgeable and trustworthy bike shop or freelance bike refurbisher, you could buy a bike they have in stock, with the components and accessories that come standard or that the shop or mechanic recommends, and ride that bike happily ever after. Or you could find that no matter how much time and money you spend tweaking the bike, swapping out components, adding accessories, etc., it's never going to fit right or be suited for your riding and travelling tastes.

Unless you are already riding a lot, and already have some experience with the sort of travel by bike you plan to do, you probably won't find the perfect touring bike for your needs and wants with the first bike you buy. That's true no matter how carefully you shop, or how much you spend. Plan accordingly. Treat your first touring bike as an experiment and part of a learning experience that will prepare you to find the right bike on your second or third try.

How much should you budget? And how should you figure out what to spend it on?

Don't spend too much at first, but don't expect to learn much from riding or customizing a piece of junk, either. It's worth spending US$500 on a first bike that will enable you to make the right US$2,000-$4,000 purchase of a second bike you can pedal happily for most of the rest of your life.

For that second bike, good new bicycles designed for touring start at about US$1,000 plus tax, for a total starting from about US$1,500 including racks (some models include a rear rack but rarely a front rack), front and rear panniers, and a handlebar bag. US$2,000 gives you a margin for swapping out, customizing, and adding components and accessories for better fit and to suit your tastes.

That may seem high if you think of a bicycle as a children's toy, but it's mostly a one-time expense: costs of routine maintenance and consumables for bicycles are low. And it compares favorably with what you might spend on motorized travel (I've never owned a motor vehicle, but I could easily have spent more on a second-hand car for a road trip than all the bicycles I've owned in my life) or on gear and lift tickets or greens fees for, say, a season of skiing or golf.

Buying a used bicycle and setting it up for touring, or buying a used one that someone else has already set up for touring, requires more knowledge and a lot more effort than buying a new bike, but can be cheaper if you know what you are doing (or have the help of a knowledgeable Friend) and can afford to be patient.

Depending on how much (if anything) you spend for a used bike, and how much (if any) of the work you do yourself, and how much you pay a bike shop or a freelance mechanic to do, you could get a serviceable old-school bike for touring for US$500 or less, a very good one for US$1,000, or a semi-modernized and professionally overhauled one for US$1,500.

The sweet spot in vintage bikes for touring is in those made from the early 1970s through the late 1980s. Within this large range, my personal preference (in which I'm far from alone) is for mid-1980s Japanese-made bikes from what the late Sheldon Brown called the glory years of Japanese bicycle in the US market: "The Japanese tourers of this era were a value unequalled before or since."

Before that sweet spot, derailleur bicycles had no mass market in the USA before the explosive 1970s "bike boom" in sales of ten-speed drop-handlebar "racing" bikes. Before that, most bikes sold in the USA were Schwinn and other domestic single-speeds, while the "high-performance" segment was dominated by Raleigh three-speeds (90% of the bicycles imported to the USA in the 1960s).

After that sweet spot, starting in the mid to late 1980s, most bike sales in the USA (and then the world) shifted to mountain bikes. Aluminum and later carbon fiber largely replaced steel as a frame material, except on the lowest-quality department-store bikes. The doubling in value of the Japanese Yen against the US dollar in 1986-1988, and continued appreciation of the Yen against the US dollar in the 1990s, rendered Japanese bikes -- which had been some of the best bike values in the world -- so expensive outside Japan that sales crashed and by the mid-1990s they largely stopped being exported.

In between, during the second bike boom in the USA in the 1970s and 1980s (the first bike boom was in the 1890s, and was worldwide, which is a fascinating but different story, and the third in the USA is ongoing), US economic prosperity and the strength of the US dollar relative to the currencies of Japan and the European countries where most bikes were being built meant that baby boomer teenagers, college students, and young adults in the USA who weren't even serious bicyclists could afford to buy bikes almost as good as (although designed somewhat differently from) those that were being ridden by top international racers.

Tens of millions of these bikes were imported to the USA. Millions of them are still in use or still potentially serviceable but gathering dust in garages, basements, and storage sheds. Prices are low but rising as the finite pool is depleted, especially in major urban areas and centers of bicycling. There is growing interest in vintage bikes, and recognition of their value. People who don't give a hoot about pedigree are finding them practical for transportation (often, but not always, after they are converted to single-speeds). Craigslist (and to a lesser extent, because shipping bicycles is a hassle, eBay) have created a new business niche for freelance mechanics who buy bikes "as is" at garage sales and thrift stores, overhaul them, and re-sell them.

Some of these "flippers" are better mechanics, while some are better at marketing. Caveat emptor. Buying a used bike has all the pitfalls of buying a used car, although the amount of money is likely to be less and the defects are usually easier for an expert to spot. If at all possible, bring a knowledgeable Friend to help you check out the bike before you buy.

The best source of parts and expertise for overhauling a vintage bike is probably a local bike repair collective, if there is one near you. Most of these (here's one incomplete list for the USA and Canada) are nonprofits or worker collectives. Typically they provide members with bike repair classes and/or personal training, workspace, tools, and access to their accumulated collections of spare parts.

Two significant but potentially costly areas for modernization of a used bike for touring are indexed shifting and new panniers that are waterproof rather than requiring separate rain covers and that attach with quick-release latches rather than bungee cords and hooks.

You can find old-school panniers cheaply on Craigslist or eBay, and perfectly sound old racks for next to nothing at garage sales, swap meets, flea markets, etc. I started out with old-school racks and panniers on my touring bike, but eventually decided it was worth replacing them with new racks and new panniers, each of which cost more than the bike had cost me. I've converted one of my five vintage bikes to indexed shifting, but not my touring bike. Old ("friction") and new ("indexed") drivetrains each have their pros and cons.

Adding fenders ("mudguards" in UK usage) is a necessary but fairly inexpensive nuisance. Most bikes other than "mountain" bikes come with insufficiently low gears for loaded touring, but with older friction shifting that too is relatively inexpensive and straightforward to change.

Whether you buy a new or used bicycle, and whether you buy your dream bike right away or experiment with a cheaper bike first, your most important resource is that Friend I've mentioned a few times already. Even if you rely primarily on the expertise of a local bike shop, you'll still need that Friend (unless you're pretty knowledgeable yourself) to find the right shop.

Most bikes sold in the USA are throwaway toys sold at department stores. Most of these, as well as most bikes sold by bike shops, are "mountain" bikes.

These aren't necessarily or primarily for going up or down mountains, and you might want a mountain bike for touring on routes or in regions where the roads, even if level, are sufficiently rough. The French name for such a bike, vélo tout terrain ("all terrain bicycle"), seems more accurate than the English "mountain bike". Confusingly, though, the French abbreviation "VTT" can mean either vélo tout terrain or the very different, véhicule tout-terrain ("all-terrain motor vehicle" or ATV in English).

Of the remaining minority of bike-shop bikes, most are either "city", "comfort", or "hybrid" bikes (comfortable for short distances, but not for long ones), or "racing" or "road" bikes completely unsuitable for touring. Often the latter are made wholly or partially out of unsuitably fragile materials like carbon fiber, with no way to mount fenders or racks or carry luggage and no clearance for sufficiency wide and sturdy tires for a heavy load or an occasional necessary mile of unpaved path, gravel highway shoulder, or dirt lane leading to a campground or bed-and-breakfast.

A dented or bent steel bike can usually be rendered rideable again. If a carbon fiber frame or fork gets cracked or scratched from a crash or a brush with a passing motor vehicle, you have to throw it away and buy a new one. Aluminum is less fragile than carbon fiber, but if it fails, it too does so catastrophically and usually irreparably.

Bike shops in the USA mostly cater to people who ride for recreation, not transportation. Since touring bikes are such a small share of even the bike-shop bicycle market, hardly any shops specialize in them or keep more than a couple in stock. Most bike shops know little or nothing about steel touring bikes (or, for that matter, any quality steel-frame bikes), and have none in stock. If that's the case, go elsewhere. Don't tempt the staff to try to sell you what they have, or what they can order for you, just to make a sale.

Ideally, you want to find a shop that sells more than one make of steel touring bicycles, has at least one in stock, will order one in your size for you to test-ride before you commit to buy it, and where the staff rides steel bikes (new and/or old) and has experience travelling by bike.

I can find several shops like that in my neighborhood in San Francisco, one of the epicenters of the current Third Wave of bike booms in the USA (and specifically a boom in bicycles for transportation). You probably won't be so fortunate elsewhere, but you should try to find a bike shop where somebody on the staff has some bike touring experience. The less relevant expertise and experience the shop has, the more important it is to bring that knowledgeable Friend I keep talking about with you, or at least to get their advice on which shop to go to.

Ask your friends, family, and other networks of contacts, and you might be surprised to find someone whom you didn't realize has fond memories of their own bicycle travels, and will be willing to help you prepare for similar adventures. A bicycle touring enthusiast might actually take vicarious pleasure in helping you find a bike and get started on your own bicycle travels.

Don't look for just anyone who rides a lot, but a bicycle tourist: someone who travels by bike, and has some knowledge and experience with touring bicycles. Most similar and next best: Someone who commutes by bicycle, in all weather, the longer their commute the better.

Someone who rides a lot for recreation, but only on a carbon-fiber "road" (racing) bike without any luggage or only off-road on a "mountain" bike, may not be of much help in shopping for a touring bike, or may give you well-meaning and authoritative-seeming but inappropriate advice.

Bicyclists and their tastes vary, and ideally you want to find someone to advise you who rides the way you plan to. But it's equally important to find someone with awareness of, and tolerance for, the diversity of bicycling tastes -- as well as knowledge of which choices are likely to be categorically wrong for any would-be bicycle tourist.

You might also find such a Friend, or at least get a recommendation for a suitable local bike shop, through a local cycling club (including randonneuring clubs: "randonneurs" typically ride steel bikes, although some of them shade off into bicycle ultra-marathoners and quasi-racers) or bicycle transportation advocacy organization. Some cycling clubs are mainly for racers (or would-be racers) in training, but others emphasize mutual support and skill-sharing. It's pretty easy to tell if you go on one of their rides. Look for riders on steel bikes, especially bikes with fenders, racks, lights, and/or panniers, and ask them where they would go to buy such a bike or have it serviced.

The Adventure Cycling Association (originally the Bikecentennial organization) publishes an annual Touring Bike Buyer's Guide, current and back issues of which are available online. Over the years, the authors of these guides have included some of the leading experts on bicycle design, and it's worth reading through the collection (skipping or skimming the reviews of specific brands and models) to get a sense of their varied opinions and the different features they think are important in choosing a bike.

Raymond Bridge's Bike Touring: The Sierra Club Guide to Travel on Two Wheels (make sure you get the 2009 second edition, not the 1979 first edition) focuses on bicycle, component, and other gear choices. Inevitably, given the number of details on which Bridge makes recommendations, I disagree with some of his specific advice. But in general, Bridge's book is excellent, and noteworthy for acknowledging and trying to explain the pros and cons of alternate choices.

Despite their usefulness, however, these guides overlook the basics of buying a bike. They talk about brands of complete bikes and frames, and component choices, but not about the general factors that you should look for in any bike, new or used, regardless of brand or price point.

What are the most important things to look for in a bicycle to use for touring?

Look for a bike that fits the following criteria, in order from most to least important:

  1. Of adequate quality, made to be maintainable and to last at least a lifetime.

  2. That fits you, or that can be made to fit you without impairing its performance. (Not a simple or unidimensional question, and one of the largest reasons you probably need expert help.)

  3. That's suitable for touring and for the sort of touring, with the amount of gear and on the types of roads or surfaces, for which you expect to use it.

Basically, a "quality" bike means the sort of bike that is, or was, sold primarily in bike shops, not the sort of "throwaway" bike sold in much larger numbers and for lower prices in department stores, toy stores, and the like. Department-store bikes aren't made to be maintainable or to last. If you want a cheaper bike than anything available new in a bike shop, get a used bike of the sort that was originally sold in a bike shop, not a department-store bike.

With respect to suitability for touring, the bad news is that only a very small proportion of new bikes, even of quality new bikes, are suitable for loaded touring.

The good news about new touring bikes is that because touring bikes are made of cheaper-to-work-with steel rather than expensive-to-work-with carbon fiber, even very high-quality new touring bikes are typically cheaper than comparable-quality new "racing" bikes. You can get a touring bike custom-made in the USA to your measurements by a top name in frame-building for US$4,000 all-in -- less than the base price of many mass-produced carbon-fiber road bikes.

The good news about used bikes for touring is that a much larger proportion of older bicycles than of new bikes are suitable for touring. That's largely because bicycles used to be designed for more "all-purpose" use, while newer bicycles are typically more narrowly optimized for a single specialized use. Most "racing" bicycles sold in the USA and Canada in 1970s and 1980s that you could find in a friend's basement or garage or on Craigslist -- steel-framed, with 36-spoke 27" wheels -- are more suitable and readily adaptable for touring than a random new bike you might buy for US$1000 or more.

Why is this? Buyers may have liked the image of a "racing" bike, but bike manufacturers used to recognize that most buyers weren't really going to race these bikes. Older bikes all had at least 36 spokes per wheel (sometimes 40 in the rear), while contemporary racing and "sport" bikes use lighter wheels with 32 or fewer spokes that are much more likely to fail under a heavy load or over the course of a long trip. And the more spokes each wheel have, the more likely it is to remain rideable even if a spoke breaks. In addition, typical 70s-80s "racing" bikes actually had frame proportions more like what would today be called "sport touring" or "club riding" geometry. With a steel frame, unlike a carbon fiber or even an aluminum frame, you can clamp rack and fender mounts onto the bike, even if it wasn't designed with brazed-on mounting eyelets for these touring necessities -- without risk of breaking the frame. And with old-school non-indexed shifting, it's not difficult to add a smaller third "granny" front gear (chainring) for climbing long hills or fighting headwinds with a heavily loaded bike.

Any bike that was originally sold with 27" diameter wheels -- even those with side-pull caliper brakes -- was designed to fit the then-standard 1 1/4" (32 mm) width tires, in contrast to contemporary racing and road bikes with 700C diameter wheels and clearance for tires no wider than 25 mm. Your tolerance (and bike-handling skill) for narrow tires on rough surfaces may vary, but for many people the difference between 25 mm and 32 mm width tires is the difference in whether they are willing to take their bike off pavement when necessary. Indeed, you could argue that the 1 1/4" (32 mm) tire width that was standard with 27" diameter wheels is the sweet spot between fast rolling and the ability to ride safely and comfortably on both paved and unpaved roads. If you start with a vintage bike that was built for 27" wheels, you won't have to change a thing to be able to use tires wide enough for at least some off-pavement use. I rode more than 500 miles last summer on 27" (diameter) x 1 1/4" (width) tires on crushed-rock trails on former railroad rights-of-way, as well as shorter stretches of dirt and coarser gravel. I wouldn't have chosen that route with a fully loaded bike on typical new racing-bike tires only 25 mm or less wide.

Unlike buying a new car, as should by now be clear, buying even a new bicycle isn't predominantly about choosing a brand and model. [In response to comments, however, I've added some suggestions of models to consider in a follow-up comment below.] Bicycles are essentially modular, and there are potentially far more combinations of components you could choose for your bicycle than there are option packages offered by any car manufacturer.

Bicycles come in sizes, but that can be misleading. A person on a bicycle is a cyborg that functions as a single entity. To function optimally and in synergy with your body, each dimension of the bicycle needs to be properly matched to the shape of the rider's body, not just their overall body size.

Some dimensions of an assembled bicycle can be adjusted (within limits) by moving a slider or turning a wrench. Others can be changed (again, within limits) by substituting components, such as handlebar stems that extend forward different distances. Others are fixed by the geometry of the frame tubes. Two people with the same leg length and total height, for example, may have different torso and arm lengths, and require bicycles with different frames.

Just as some people with proportions that don't match manufacturers' standards have to sew their own clothes or have them custom made if they want them to fit, some people can't find any mass-produced bicycles that will get them well. Fortunately, high-quality "production" bicycles are made in such small quantities with so much hand labor that made-to-measure custom or semi-custom steel bicycle frames don't cost as much more than good production steel bikes as you might expect.

Even if you are ready to buy the bike of your dreams, it's impossible to tell from catalog descriptions which model(s) might be well suited to your proportions. And even if a particular frame can be adjusted to fit you well, you can't expect any bicycle to fit you out-of-the-box. A bike may come with a "standard" set of components, but most bike shops will allow you to substitute other components for only the difference between the prices of the components, as long as you tell them what you want before they assemble and adjust the new bike: shorter or longer cranks, a shorter or longer stem, differently sized and/or curved handlebars, a different saddle, smaller chainrings for lower gears, and so forth.

Because so much of the fit is determined by the frame geometry, and can't be adjusted after you've bought the frame, a good bike shop will measure you (and your present bike, if you have one) carefully, before they begin to recommend which models might fit. Some shops include fitting with the sale of a new bike, while others charge for a fitting but will apply the cost of the fitting to the price of the new bike that you subsequently buy from them.

Even adjusting and setting up a demo bike for a test ride could take a bike shop half an hour or more, while a full-fledged fitting could involve an hour or two with the bike shop's fit expert watching you pedal and measuring you on a special adjustable stationary bicycle that allows the seat, pedals, and handlebars to be moved up and down, forward and back, and in and out relative to each other.

Do you have to go through all this to buy a bike? No, but if it's done right, and you end up taking the bike on a long tour, you won't regret it. If you spend a lot of time and money trying to make a bike fit, only to find that it's impossible to make that frame work for you, you will regret it. If you are going to need a custom bike for proper fit, it's better to learn that early in your bike search. Women with short torsos are especially likely to need custom bikes, because most off-the-shelf bikes are designed for typical male proportions and it's harder to make a bike fit a smaller person without using smaller-than-standard wheels.

Some people are less sensitive to small variations, but the longer you spend on the bike, the more you'll notice even the most minute deviation from perfect fit. Get the seat and handlebar height vaguely right, and I can ride almost any bike for ten miles or so without undue discomfort. After twenty miles, I'll feel it in my knees if the seat height is off by a centimeter. After fifty miles, I'll feel it in my wrists if the brake levers -- where I rest my hands most of the time -- are mispositioned on the handlebars by a couple of millimeters.

If you're not yet ready to pay for a professional fitting, and don't already have a bike that fits you perfectly for all-day loaded riding, to use as a dimensional model, you should think carefully about whether you are ready to commit to the price of a new bike that might not fit -- or whether, as discussed above, you might be better off experimenting with a cheaper bike first. As I noted earlier, you can give bicycle travel an initial try on an overnight or weekend trip on almost any half-decent bicycle that more-or-less fits and that you or someone you know has lying around, or that you can pick up second hand for a couple of hundred dollars (or less).

And if this all seems hopelessly complicated, find that knowledgeable Friend I keep talking about, to help guide you through the process or at least steer you to the right bike shop. There are also links to some books and online resources that I find useful in the sidebar of this blog under "Bicycle Travel".

Most of this is the same regardless of where you plan to take your bike, in your home country or overseas. Next week, I'll have some tips on those bicycle and component choices that are specifically influenced by whether you plan to travel internationally with your bike.

Bon voyage, et bonne randonnée!

Link | Posted by Edward on Sunday, 3 November 2013, 23:59 (11:59 PM) | TrackBack (0)
Comments

that was a load. let me try to simplify. if you're going to use the one covered with dust in the garage to start with, new tires will make the biggest difference. if not, remember that bicycles are not manufactured, they're assembled. when a key element, like pedal setup changes,so does everything else. so, rule one: don't buy any bike that does not have cotterless cranks. period. a perfectly serviceable touring bike is the surly long haul trucker, at about a thousand. tires are a big deal. if on-road, i suggest 28 in the front ,32 in the back, where the panniers are. if you have front as well as rear and will be offroad as well as on, 32 in the front, 35 in the rear.

we are warm showers hosts - that is , we put up around the world bicyclists. our guests have been on the road 7 months, 2 and a half years,etc. good quality and durability come first. the fine points of fit, etc become secondary when you're carrying 75 0r 80 pounds of stuff for camping cooking, mountains and deserts.

so, start where you are, and start easy. see if you like it. stick a rear rack on the garage bike and some cheap book carrier panniers, and try riding 10 or 15 miles to a friend's house, and back the next day. then, take it from there.

i've been bicycling overseas every year but two since 1975. when there was an iron curtain, i rode behind it, solo. i've ridden across the usa. equipment is important, but the willingness to just be out there, taking what comes, counts for me. bon voyage

Posted by: harvey t. lyon, 10 November 2013, 15:47 ( 3:47 PM)

Thanks to Harvey Lyon for your comment. As you say, the hardest part is deciding just to do it.

I agree that new tires (and, I would add, new brake pads!) are the first things to upgrade on an old bike. Materials science has made huge improvements in these components in the last 20 years. New tires will get fewer flats, and new pads will brake better, especially when wet, than even the best old ones.

I also agree on avoiding any bike with cotterless cranks. These are among the distinguishing features of department store bikes, along with low-quality frame tubing and some other things.

I disagree that fit is less important with a heavily loaded bike. Your proclivity to saddle sores and soft tissue and joint injuries may vary, but in general I think fit becomes more important the more hours you spend on the bike -- regardless of the weight of the bike and load.

The mechanics, the cadence (pedal revolutions per minute), the force on the pedals, your power output, and the stress on your body are essentially the same whether you are pedaling a heavy bike slowly down the road in a low gear or a light bike in a higher gear at a higher speed.

The Surly brand "Long Haul Trucker" model is one of the bikes I was thinking of at the low end of widely-available new mass-market bikes designed for touring. Current list price is US$1300 plus tax, not including pedals, fenders, or racks:

http://surlybikes.com/bikes/long_haul_trucker

The similar Novarra "Randonnee" model (Novarra is the REI house brand) is slightly cheaper at US$1200 plus tax, including a rear rack (but also not including pedals, fenders, or a front rack):

http://www.rei.com/product/816068/

The Bruce Gordon "Basic Loaded Touring" model has different stock options (from (US$500 for a bare frameset to US$1725 for a full build including top-quality front and rear racks) but probably works out similar or just a little higher in price:

http://www.bgcycles.com/blt.html

as does the Velo-Orange "Campeur" (also US$500 for a bare frameset):

http://store.velo-orange.com/index.php/frames/vo-campeur-frame.html

Some others are available only by mail order, which I wouldn't recommend unless you are very confident of your own competence as a bike mechanic (or that of a trusted Friend who is willing to help you).

In Canada, there's the MEC "National" for C$1350 not including pedals, fenders, or racks, although it's a little less to my taste in several details (brifters rather than bar-end shifters, not quite as low gears, carbon-fiber seatpost):

http://www.mec.ca/product/5030-652/mec-national-bicycle-unisex/

The closest UK counterpart in quality and wide availability is probably the Dawes "Galaxy" model at UK£800 including fenders, rear rack, and front and rear fenders but not a front rack:

http://www.dawescycles.com/p-791-galaxy.aspx

The two oldest and largest Japanese bicycle companies both offer interesting and atractively-priced steel randonneur/touring bikes in slightly smaller frame sizes, although neither currently appears to be distributed in North America. These include the Maruishi "Emperor" for JPY105,000 (approx. USD1,100) including front and rear fenders, complete except for racks:

http://www.maruishi-cycle.com/products/emperor/e-tc

and the Miyata "Eiger", similarly equipped for JPY139,000 (approx USD1,425):

http://www.miyatabike.com/project/japon/en_bike_eiger.html

If you are comparing prices, be sure to include everything you will want: pedals, saddle, fenders, racks, tires, etc. You might expect these to be included, but often they aren't.

These are the most obvious possibilities for new touring bikes, but there are many others, including (in the USA) those listed in the most recent Adventure Cycling Association touring bike buyers guide. And there is also the option of using, renovating, and perhaps upgrading an older bike.

Posted by: Edward Hasbrouck, 11 November 2013, 11:47 (11:47 AM)

maybe you, or we, should continue with other data - i use rattrap pedals so my shoes are quite different from those for clips. panniers, basic tools, but, i would think, a lot on training and maybe a class at your local bike shop on maintenance.

Posted by: haevey t. lyon, 11 November 2013, 12:27 (12:27 PM)

The nashbar steel touring bike at $700 would be a more affordable entry-level option than the ones listed for people to get riding enough to learn what they need:

http://www.nashbar.com/bikes/Product_10053_10052_522412_-1___202339

Because it's cheaper, more people might be able and willing to try it out.

Note that nashbar frequently has sales which offer 20% off, so the final price would be $560 plus tax and shipping. They sometimes also offer sales that include free shipping.

This frame, if replaced by a more expensive one later on for touring, could then serve as a steel frame for utility cycling, a backup frame for touring, or a bicycle for companions to use.

Note also that this bike comes partially assembled, so less knowledge and tools are required for assembly.

Also, Fuji offers a touring bicycle with an MSRP of $889:
http://www.fujibikes.com/bike/details/touring

And, of course, the Trek 520 is still available at $1429.99:
http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes/road/touring/520/520/#

Posted by: ryan, 25 November 2013, 10:16 (10:16 AM)

@ryan - I considered mentioning the Nashbar steel touring bike, and some other mail order only touring bikes, but decided not to.

As I said in my original article: "Some others are available only by mail order, which I wouldn't recommend unless you are very confident of your own competence as a bike mechanic (or that of a trusted Friend who is willing to help you)."

Unless you or your Friend are already skilled enough to do your own bike fitting, to set up and adjust your own bike (as you note, the Nashbar bike, like any mail order bike, comes only partially assembled), and to do your own tuneups and adjustments (generally included for the first several months, sometimes up to a year, in the price of a new bike purchased from a local bike shop), I don't recommend buying a bike by mail.

If you pay a local bike shop for a fitting, tuneups, and even partial assembly and initial adjustment, a mail-order bike will probably end up costing you more than buying a bike from a local shop in the first place.

The Trek 520 model is something of an "old standby", but it's mostly a vestigial item in a Trek catalog dominated by carbon-fiber racing bikes. I'd go to a Trek dealer and look at Trek bikes if I wanted a carbon-fiber racing bike, but they aren't the experts in steel touring bikes. There's no point paying for Trek's brand image and expertise in carbon-fiber racing bikes if that's not what you want. I think the odds are that you'll get better value and better advice from dealers and brands whose reputations and expertise are built on the sort of bike you want.

The Fuji steel touring bike is one of several others listed in the ACA buying guide I linked to. It is a bit cheaper than some of the models I mentioned (I limited myself to ones I have seen and would recommend), but has some distinctly inferior components, most conspicuously 32-spoke front and rear wheels. I tour on a 40-spoke rear wheel (which used to be standard, and is still nice if you can find it, although today many people would consider it overkill), and would insist on at least 36-spoke wheels on a touring bike.

Cutting down the spoke count saves only a little on price or weight, but makes it significantly more likely not only that spokes will break, but also that a broken spoke will render the bike unrideable. It's a false economy that makes the initial purchase price lower but is likely to strand you in the middle of nowhere.

Posted by: Edward Hasbrouck, 25 November 2013, 11:30 (11:30 AM)

Thanks for this article. I frequently ride to work, and so have lots of experience, yet still enjoy seeing tips from other riders. I like your viewpoint on professional bike riders (those who use it for their work, not to entertain others while racing on a tightly controlled course).

I have a road bike now, though am looking for a change, because my feet sometimes hit my rear panniers, (unless they are pressed all the way back on my rack), and I occasionally hit my toes on the front wheel when it's turned. I'm considering a touring bike (thinking that it would be longer, and eliminate those two problems), though one bike shop owner recommended a cyclocross bike instead, as he said it would ride better with the light loads I typically have on the ride to work. I also want it to be dull and unattractive (so no shifters on brake levers), and I always ride on pavement, and want something fast. What would you suggest?

Kevin

Posted by: Kevin, 19 December 2013, 21:55 ( 9:55 PM)

@Kevin, as to your question about a cyclocross bike:

I wonder whether the shop was suggesting a 'cross bike because they thought it was the *best* bike for your needs, or because it was the best bike for your needs that they had in stock.

'Cross bikes are becoming more popular, even for people who don't use them for their intended purpose (races on courses that are mostly or entirely unpaved, and that include obstacles over which bikes must be carried).

Too much bicycle design is driven by racing, and too many people who aren't racers are stuck choosing between bicycles optimized for one or another sort of racing.

'Cross bikes are actually more useful for general transportation than most road (racing) bikes. In general, they are a more expensive, lighter, higher-quality alternative to a "utility" or "hybrid" bike.

I would strongly consider one if I wanted a bike that i could ride off-road or on that I could ride over curbs and on bad pavement without worrying as much about being thrown by potholes or railroad tracks, if I wanted a light bike to carry up and down stairs at my home and/or place of work, and if I carried my stuff on my back rather than in panniers.

But you don't mention any of those criteria.

Because it is designed for wider off-road tires, a 'cross bike is more likely than most late-model "road" bikes to have clearance for fenders (at least if you use slightly narrower tires than the maximum that will fit in the frame). But for its intended (racing) use, it has neither fenders nor panniers. Any extra toe or heel clearance on a particular 'cross model is largely coincidental.

Similarly, 'cross bikes are *not* optimized for handling with panniers.

Toe clearance (even with fenders) and heel clearance *are* design goals for touring bikes.

Not all touring bikes are heavy "expedition" bikes like the Surly "Long Haul Trucker", even if that is the model of touring bike that your local bike shop is most likely to stock and be familiar with.

It sounds like what you really want, though, is what used to be called a "sport touring" or "club riding" bike: fairly light and fast, but not as single-purpose a racing bike as most contemporary "road" bikes, and designed to be capable of carrying at least small panniers without heel
overlap or dire effects on handling, and usually with at least minimal fender clearance.

Bikes like this are, sadly, even harder to find new than touring bikes.

But given that you also say you want an ugly duckling rather than a theft magnet, have you considered a vintage bike? It might be a hassle to find the right one and get it set up to your taste (or it might not), but the key thing is that typical vintage road bikes -- steel 10-12 speeds from the 1970s through early 1990s -- were much more useful general-purpose bikes, even if they were sold as "racing bikes", than today's road bikes. Typically, they had significantly more heel and toe clearance.

I do a lot of my riding on a 1986 Miyata 912. It was sold as a criterium or triathlon bike, and was used by many serious amateur racers. But it has room for panniers, and I could squeeze fenders in if I liked. It was built for 700C wheels; if you start with a bike made for 27" wheels, and switch to 700C wheels, you'll get a tad more fender and heel clearance. (Although 27" wheels are actually still perfectly useful, and there are fine 27" tires available. My favorites are Continental Gatorskins: a bit heavy, but very fast on pavement for their puncture resistance.)

If tracking down a vintage sport touring or club riding bike isn't for you, I'd go back to the bike shop and ask about light touring bikes.

Happy riding,

Edward

Posted by: Edward Hasbrouck, 19 December 2013, 21:59 ( 9:59 PM)

Edward:

Where do you buy your wheels and which do you buy? I would like to get some of these 40-spoke wheels. Actually, I would like to build up some strong wheels myself to learn. If you could refer to online retailers it would be most convenient for me because I do not have good local access to bicycle shops.

Also, what do you recommend I read to learn more? I have Effective Cycling by Forester, Zinn's books and ParkTool's Big Blue Book.

Thanks,

Ryan

Posted by: Ryan, 4 April 2014, 20:19 ( 8:19 PM)

@Ryan - I've never built a wheel or bought a new factory-built replacement wheel. I've either used the wheels that have come with my (vintage) bikes, bought used (vintage) wheels, or had wheels built by a local bike shop.

Sheldon Brown's Web site has an introduction to wheelbuilding. The wheelbuilding book that everyone says is definitive is "The Bicycle Wheel" by Jobst Brandt. I've met someone mechanically handy who said they taught themself to build wheels from that book, and was happy with the results after the first few tries.

But at least if you buy all the parts new (hub, spokes, and rim), labor is only a moderate fraction of the total cost of a professionally-built bespoke wheel.

Vintage 40-spoke rear freewheel wheels, rear hubs, and rims are uncommon but not rare. They were used at at various times time on most English bikes, on many touring bikes sold in the USA and Canada (especially from the late 1970s through early 1990s), and on some tandems.

Used 40-spoke cassette rear hubs and wheels are much harder to find, although they are available new. They are common on new tandems, and it may be possible to adapt a 40-spoke tandem hub by removing spacers.

Suzue/Sanshin/Sunshine (different brand names used by the name Japanese manufacturer) are probably the most common high-quality used 40-spoke freewheel hubs, although you might luck out and find a sturdier used 40-spoke Phil Wood hub.

You can find both 27" and 700C vintage 40-spoke wheels and rims, but 27" are significantly easier to find and usually cheaper.

You can find these in all the places you might find other used components: Craigslist, eBay, bike swap meets, garage sales, or the parts bin and rim rack of your local bike repair coop. Sometimes it's worth buying an entire cheap old bike with a damaged or otherwise low-value frame for a good set of vintage wheels.

New 40-spoke rims, hubs, and wheels are common on new tandems and are available from several manufacturers at varied prices and quality levels. Few shops keep them in stock, so be prepared to wait for one to be special-ordered if you break a rim on tour. If you need one in a hurry, look for a specialist tandem shop.

In the USA, Peter White Cycles has a large selection of touring and tandem hubs, rims, and wheels available for mail order:

http://www.peterwhitecycles.com/

If you want written guidance on mechanical issues, especially for vintage bikes, start with Sheldon Brown's Web site. It's far better than any book I've seen:

http://www.sheldonbrown.com

Other books I find useful for dealing with vintage bikes and components are reference books of the same vintage as the bikes and components I'm dealing with.

The 1994 edition of "Bicycling Magazine's Complete Guide to Bicycle Maintenance and Repair" has well-illustrated step-by-step guides to common mechanical tasks, emphasizing the "old-school" technical standards of lugged steel frames with standard-diameter tubes, threaded quill stems, non-indexed shifting, loose-ball bearings, screw-on freewheels, and separate shift and brake levers.

"Bicycling Magazine's Complete Guide to Upgrading Your Bike", by Frank Berto (1988) is a valuable reference to components of that same era.

Forester's "Effective Cycling" is one of the best books on a quite different (but at least equally important) topic: riding in traffic. I review it and compare it with some other suggested books on this subject in my own article on riding skills:

http://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/002096.html

Happy reading and riding,

Edward

Posted by: Edward Hasbrouck, 5 April 2014, 10:27 (10:27 AM)

Edward,

Thank you for such a detailed answer!!! I'm already checking out the website and books you referred me to.

Ryan

Posted by: Ryan, 5 April 2014, 14:31 ( 2:31 PM)

If you are thinking of buying a touring bike in Europe, here are a couple of makes to consider, new or used, in the UK or on the continent:

Dawes Galaxy (starting from GBP829, approx. USD1400):

http://dawescycles.com/product/galaxy/

The Dawes Galaxy is the most common model of touring bike in the UK. It's been in production (with changes in design and components, of course) for decades, and there are a lot of older used ones available second-hand at good prices.

Edinburgh Bicycle Cooperative "Revolution Country Explorer" for GBP699 (approx. USD1200) including fenders and rear rack:

http://www.edinburghbicycle.com/products/revolution-country-explorer-14

This gets good reviews, and is a bit cheaper than an otherwise comparable new Dawes, but I haven't seen one of these first hand yet. I wouldn't choose disk brakes, but your tastes may be different.

vsf fahrradmanufaktur TX-400 (EUR1299, approx. USD1800):

http://www.fahrradmanufaktur.de/katalog/expedition/TX-400-Shimano-Deore-XT-30-Gang

"vsf fahrradmanufaktur" sells mainly through local bike shops in German and Dutch-speaking countries. As with the Surly "Long Hual Trucker" I mentioned earlier in this thread, but to an even greater degree, their "Expedition" touring bikes are heavy (strong, but heavy) but come with standard components that would be hugely more expensive purchased separately: the basic price includes factory-fitted dynamo hubs and lights, high-quality front and rear racks, hydraulic brakes, etc. The TX-800 for EUR1599 may be an even better value for the price. Note that because the Magura hydraulic brake levers are designed only for horizontal handlebars, this model doesn't currently play well with drop handlebars. Magura has made hydraulic brake levers for drop bars in the past, and may do so again, so this could change.

Posted by: Edward Hasbrouck, 25 May 2014, 07:24 ( 7:24 AM)

What about buying a touring bike Down Under?

Shipping and duties for imported bikes, and smaller production runs for locally-made bikes, typically make prices of tthe same or comparable bikes and components significantly higher in Australia than in North America or Europe.

That said, the most popular local Australian brand of touring-specific bike is the Vivente "World Randonneur" line:

http://www.viventebikes.com

They offer models with a choice iof handlebar styles (drop bars, flat bars, or German-style "trekking bars"), brifters or bar-end shifters, 700C or 26" wheels, and derailleurs or an internal hub gears.

These are comparable in design and setup to some of the vsf fahrradmanufaktur models.

Prices start at AUD2300, which seems high (and is) but is in line with Australian prices for other comparable bikes, including dynamo hub, lights, rack, fenders, etc.

Posted by: Edward Hasbrouck, 5 September 2014, 22:25 (10:25 PM)
Post a comment









Save personal info as cookie?